The book description above talks about newspapers and broadcasters having helped to create a shared culture? A shared culture? Whatever happened to celebrating diversity and differences? I grew up in India. And having spent the first two-thirds of my life in what the westerner’s consider a third world country, my view is that shared culture is a debatable term. India and probably a lot of the other countries like it have also in recent years been exposed to the “programming” by the Westerm newspapers and broadcasters (Ted Turner is no fool!). And you know what there is a damn good reason it’s called “programming”. Because that is precisely what it is doing! Pop-culture in India is just as much about the type of stuff you get to see on MTV or in the daily soaps as it is here in the US.
What the shared culture has achieved is a polarized effect. All the negative values of the Western world are what have been assimilated into the culture of other countries. The positive values never seems to permeate through the selctively semi-permeable membrance of the mass media. Western culture has some very positive aspects which people in India and other countries like it really need… to start with, a strong work ethic, honesty, punctuality and efficiency.
Human knowledge is advanced not by creating drones who all have the same shared culture or information, but more so by being willing, ready and able to dig into the depths of certain topics and then sharing that information with others. I definitely do not claim to be an expert on everything, but at the same time there are something that I can hope to become an expert at and help in the advancement of the overall state of knowledge for humanity.
The very premise of a Ph.D. in any subject area is to develop a depth of knowledge, which my definition is narrow. If you think that the Internet makes us narrowminded, then why not start with getting rid of Ph.Ds since they seems to be generating the highest number of people with highly specialized knowledge in a relatively narrow area! (Wait, isn’t the author of that book a Ph.D?)
In the nine plus years that I have been on the Internet for lets just say more than several hours per day, I have used the Net to do all kinds of stuff. I’ve used it to get information specific to my business, my industry my field. I’ve used it for humor, entertainment, zany news stories ranging from square watermelons in Japan to make them fit better in refrigerators to conjoint twin crocodiles (sorry, couldn’t find the link to this one!) to the word “Doh!” (cnn) being added in the Oxford English dictionary! I’ve used it to make friends, meet people, I’ve used it to communicate with people all over the world. My sites have at one point or the other had hits from practically every country that has Internet access… and I’m not exaggerating, I have the logs to prove it.
Take a very simple example of where the mass media failed miserably and the Internet came to the rescue… the 2000 Olympics. NBCs decision to insert the artificial delay in their broadcast of the Olympics so that they could show the games in “prime-time” in the United States has got to be the most stupid decision I’ve seen in a long time. Get with it people. We’re in the Information Age. Information is power, but in order for it to be power, you need to be able to get to it first. Reminds me of the quote I put in the quotes file back in 1993 from the movie Sneakers…
There is a war out there… and it’s not about bullets…
… it’s about the information, the bits and bytes, the zeroes and ones.
So what happened with the Olympics? People who had a clue, got on the Net and found the information they were looking for. And if it wasn’t on the site of the US broadcasters companion websites, it was on the official Olympics website or even on the sites originating in other countries. The Internet made it possible.
In fact the perfect example of the impact of the Internet on making it posible for people to not only find, but express their different points of view is right under your nose. You’re reading it! It’s called a blog! And all of those thousands of people out there who take the time and put in the effort to write what they think are contributing to the different points of view on the Internet, which no newspapers, no mass media, no broadcast medium could ever dream of achieving. (I guess I should plug things like aortal here..)
Honestly, saying that the Internet makes us more narrowminded is not doing justice to he human ability to excercise their own independent decision and free will to choose what they want to read, what they want to learn. If I want to be a narrowminded redneck/hick (well, that would be really hard for me, but hypothetically speaking…) I could do that with or without the Internet. The examples of people who have been duped by polarized information are abundant. In my opinion you don’t need to look further than things like Nazi Germany to organized religion and belief systems. Mind control exists. And it’s been around a whole lot longer than the Internet!
You know, there are still some of us out there, myself included, who would like to believe that we have our own good sense and discretion to choose what information we need to be exposed to and to make those judgements in a way that makes us the types of individuals we want to be, instead of the drones of a shared culture. Darwinism isn’t dead yet. And as my high school motto said… “Perfection cannot be achieved by the weak”.
So just let the people be. Let the Net be. Because what makes the Net, is the people….