Well folks it’s been over 24 hours now that sneaker.org has been getting bombarded by people searching for Q33NY and Wingdings. Things are holding up pretty well… but can’t say the same about my opinion that there are an even number of rational people and irrational people in the world. Some of the comments people have left on the site and even more so the emails or instant messages I have received on this topic have definitely made for a fun-filled, hilarious day. Crazy. People, don’t you get it? I think my friend karenika put it best… it’s a F*ING FONT people!!
This has gotten SO out of hand now that the lead story in the Wired News email this evening was MS Denies Wingding Thing, Again. Now, my skepticism, doesn’t preclude me from putting it beyond some Microsoft developer from planting such an easter-egg. That’s still possible. But I still stand firm that the whole Q33NY thing related to the tragedy at the WTC is completely bogus, completely fabricated and utter bullshit. (Anyhow, for those of you who still don’t get it read on below for yesterday (in What’s New) and day before’s (in Thought – caught in the act!) posts.)
The following comment by one of the visitors to the site definitely merits being highlighted…
- Len (lgjohnson@adelphia.net)
US tail numbers start with “N”. An alpha character is not allowed following the N. According to “Landings”, no tail number like Q33NY or N-Q33Ny or N-33NY has ever been assigned. My tail number, N-637PS, is typical. The other explanation for why Q33NY is a hoax is also bunk. Flight numbers refer to a route, not an individual airplane. Airplanes are temporarily assigned a flight number when they fly the corresponding route. It is never the same as a tail number, which is assigned by the FAA permanently to an individual airplane.
09-22-2001 21:23